>>7652030Yeah when you say that you're just confusing atheism and rationalism. If scientists dismissed anything that they haven't had proof of, then they'd just stop looking for more things to prove and no progress would be made. The most important bottom line is, anything you accept without a solid proof or disproof is not a fact, it's a conjecture. Sadly many of the modern day atheists are underage fedora's that probably haven't even heard of the word conjecture before. But every group of people that gets large enough is bound to start containing idiots, what else is new. No matter what group of people you're dealing with you're probably better off just ignoring the biggest idiots instead of assuming they're representative of the group, it's better for your blood pressure
