>>7674108Can we take a moment to decode your response? You're saying that you're congratulating me on my literacy in the manner of a paraplegic winning a special Olympic event. So you're telling me that you're congratulating me in the manner of a person in a wheelchair who has just competed and won a medal at the special Olympics? An event for people with mental disabilities?
Now I assume you meant that my literacy is comparable to a quadrapalegic winning an event at the special Olympics. Which would mean a person paralyzed in their arms and legs has won an event at the special Olympics. Where they wouldn't qualify to be in.
I thimk you're assuming that a loss of your motor functions in your limbs disables you mentally. It doesn't necessarily.
But let's go further. A person who can't use their limbs has won an event at the special Olympics. For one they got into it which is impressive. I won't assume they're mentally disabled because you didn't state that they were. But then they won an event against people with full control over their limbs...
If anything that's more impressive than insulting. It's honestly just insulting because you thought you said something clever.
