>>783426Because we (whites and generally first world countries) are the ones who bred them for companionship. Other lower cultures buy them and don't know what to do with them because they're savages.
Look at Japanese people, they love dogs. They get it. They're also pale-skinned, I'm starting to see a correlation.
We used them for hunting and it allowed us to evolve. Lower cultures will never evolve and are essentially the modern day equivalent if using a power drill for hammering nails, totally retarded. Nips are fishermen and farmers, so they use dogs mainly as companionship.
>>783431Hence why I said
"I have it set to be released at the same time as when you release your first argument."
I roasted you, friendo, might want to try to type something clever to address the fact that I humiliated you along with someone else simultaneously, multi-tasking style. But I ain't a rapper.
>>783526Well, I don't boil and burn animals alive. I don't mistreat them. I don't work in factory farms, and if I did, I would make sure that they were treated humanely, and if they weren't, I would quit and report it to the authorities.
There is no original sin here, I am not responsible for how swamp politicians refuse to enact and enforce animal protection laws or how moronic farmers abuse animals to save pennies on the dollar.
I would switch to lab grown meat because it would save animal lives, not that there's anything wrong with killing an animal for food. It's nature. There is something wrong with animal cruelty, which ALL dog meat farms are guilty of, and first world factory farms may be guilty of, certainly not in all cases. Even then, some farm-grown meat has been becoming popular, but even then, I have to take it on faith that the animal wasn't mistreated.
I eat food for sustenance, which includes meat, because it's important to eat meat. Deal with it nerd, there is no dilemma here. I'm not responsible for the suffering of any animal.