so from some of you faggots suggestions i have made a short of conclusion to form a filosophy;

There is a being, that is, to the human sense, non-inteligent and non-passionate. This being is, to an extent, not a determined entity, but the congruent combination of all things on existance both in the past and in the future. It follows a certain set of rules that can be calculated and expressed trought mathematical reasons. However, those reasons can range in complexity, and some of them can not be comprehended by human intellect. Yet still, those rules can only be acnowledged as physical laws. These laws, if were to be properly calculated with enought detail, could predict the future because of the fact that all things in matter and existance are provoqued one by the other. Due to this, every single event is caused by the combination of previous events. In the phisical part of reality that we can percieve, (wich is the present(, it does not exist, but in the (lets say) "fabric" of time, they do. These laws can not be broken, nor follow what the human mind calls good or bad, and are thereby independent of it. The human mind, on the other hand, is not created by a "willing" part of the being, but instead is a part of it flowing in one of its segments in time. In the same way, since morality and other precepts are not sustained by reality but by a series of fallacies man created trought its evolutionary path, they have no value and are to be ignored when it is convenient to do so.

Please give me counter arguments this feels like too much of a retarded conclusion