It's pretty based to know what sex is supposed to feel like. You know, like god intended. I can't imagine why people would mutilate a little baby, ruining this experience before they could even have a say. It is really quite sad. What is sadder is that you then have a generation, sometimes even an entire people, who look at a natural penis and think it is disgusting. This is a pathology of the most obvious type, to mock the natural body and to see the only solution as pointless mutilation, against the will of a baby
All of the excuses are laughable. "B-but lower risk of cancer", yeah and if you cut of your foot you won't get cancer there either
"B-but how could someone possibly clean the foreskin" not even worth responding to
"Lower risk of infec-" this is retarded, not only because there is evidence suggesting that this effect is either non-existent or tiny, but because if you tell people they have a lower risk of infection they will probably just engage in more risky behaviour. This might not be the case for Jews/Muslims with strict moral codes, but in the modern West this is a non-starter
"But girls prefer it!" Men in African tribes prefer elongated necks. How is this a justification for mutilation
Not to mention, you are now dependant on moisturiser and lose the self-lubrication function of the penis. There is also evidence to suggest that the intense pain experience as a young child isn't forgotten in the true sense
If there is a god, he is sending baby mutilators to hell
