>>8235944They ate them or got eaten by them instead. One interesting case study was about how africans could not manage to domesticate zebras whereas everywhere else in the world, horses were domesticated and even made to breed mules and all sorts or crazy stuff. When some colonizers went to africa a few managed to domesticate zebras in mere 1 year or so.
After all, a zebra is basically a palette swap of a horse. But nope, africans could not domesticate almost any animal for the centuries and even more time they had on earth in that place. Now if you try to research this you find propagandised leftard drivl about how zebras are not domesticable at all(yet another example of these subhumans being a hinderance to mankind's progress) and the colonisers who did domesticate a few was an exception because reasons.
Their reasoning is that since africans could not domesticate the zebra, it must mean not that africans are subhumans, but that the zebra is not domesticable, so stop trying.
Look at this dude
>>8235947, trying to derail the conversation altogether. He cannot watch his precious negro golems being blasted
