>>8369004Being sexually aroused by drawings that depict children doesn't make one a pedophile.
As an adult, I have never seen a child and even remotely thought that I wanted to have sex with him/her. That's because I'm not a pedophile. Furthermore, I believe it is wrong to treat children that way.
Finding a loli picture sexually arousing because of the qualities of a child, like you mentioned- innocence, vulnerability- or even the quality of being a child- does not make one a pedophile. There is a clear distinction between that and pedophilia.
A pedophile is one that is sexually attracted exclusively or near-exclusively to prepubescent children. It is a mental disorder. Even if you stretch the definition to "one that is sexually attracted to prepubescent children", that's still not enough to classify everyone who is aroused by OP's picture as a pedophile.
Granted, many probably are, but there is a clear distinction which should not be ignored.
