>>8481400I don't remember the names but there is a book by soviet economists comparing energy output of USSR steel factories to US steel factories, and they claimed for our factories require 3 times as much energy as US ones did.
Year of stockpile alone speaks volumes about effectivness of your economy tbqh.
Also same book, there was transport infratructure comparisson and they pointed out train carts operating 24/7 in USSR which is bad because it means infrastructure lacked carts and was overflown with goods needed to be transfered. Considering total output was less than what US had it was pretty abyssmal. And if you bring US's own commies forming unions and fucking their own transportation into the ground at the very same time it just becomes plain stupid.
>basically the same with capitalism.They do it with bubbles. Ye some people throw themselves off the rooftops but nothing major like revolutions really. Whole model is just much more sustainable and lasts for 3-4 generations rather than 1-2. Old one just dies before they can start revolting so all good.
>its a subjective minus, i dont care personally.Um, no sweetie:)
Its objective because it directly affects output of economy. If there are incentives to make money capitalist economy will always provide market and competition on the market with will improve consumer's quality of life since competing parties will struggle to provide better goods at lowest rates while consuming as low resources as they possibly can. Competition makes economy healther by weeding out ineffective businesses which overall makes economy more effective.
So ye, its objective plus.
