>>8659112>every day and so on is already an affirmation of the normalcy of being straightonly if they assume its in the inherent nature of straight people to shit on those who are not straight. i.e. that being straight is being an enemy.
yet there is not a cabal, a conspiracy, of straight people lording over the straights to tell them what is and is not acceptable. I don't even know how anyone could even manage the influence needed to make that happen. There would be free-riders all over the place. Not to mention how they would be able to levy the large "tax" they would have to put on those outside of their group (since their group is so large) to get the "benefits" they desire.
To put it simply: Manipulation is difficult to prove without total force - its too easy to get a dissenting voice.
It's always funny to me how some people hate the world we live in, when it is from this very world they are allowed to exist, protest, and dissent.
In others words, either the argument is persuasive, or its not.
all rhetoric is valid.
If people want to do their own thing, in their own time, go their own way, fine. But the moment someone wants to make others accept their worldviews, they have to make it valuable to them to accept it. Either it's persuasive or it's not. The world works on the margins. Not absolutes; not on whether it exists/doesn't exist. It works on marginal compromises; persuasion.
>but 'straight pride' events belittle that.literally not true.
>the people who populate those come just to start trouble for others not like them.>simply existing is a cause for troubledamn. are you religious?
