>>8747171That reminds me
>>226827129>an Onelol
But seriously, fuck off, Aristotle. A god would not be subject to the laws of the worst Greek thinker.
>multipleBecause a true One can be total while retaining a multiplicity. This is a contradiction without resolution in the Platonic sense.
If God is a single energy then he cannot be love, peace, war, and justice, etc. Those essences are diluted or even lost in his opposition to contradiction.
The pagan gods are not everything, but they are sovereign over a dominion which acts as a totality rather than a universal. This is necessary in a hierarchy, the ability to raise one another up, a unity that also increases the force of each being within it - much like the monarch tree in a forest gives a sense of power to all those within it.
Pagan gods are not creators in the same sense as the Christian God, it is more like an act of force, we are formed of the blood of the gods and rise from the earth.
>moral law good evilMoral law is a human conception, it is not determinant of good and evil. You have it backwards. Reliance upon morality occurs when force has been lost, when the natural laws no longer exert themselves over people like the elements, much as will. The pagan idea works more in that sense.
Again, justice has nothing to do with morality, at least not necessarily, it exists beyond that and may even require an opposition to law or what could appear as hubris. Humanity at times may have to challenge the gods in order to maintain its dominion, and it is only in this heroism that justice can be maintained.
There is also a higher form of justice which can act as an elemental and monstrous force. Again, it is not controlled by human concepts. it is actually strange that the Christian insists on such human laws and submission of God to them.
