>>901628I understand perfectly well what was written out, you cretin.
Everything you're saying comes across as intellectual all the while shrowding over a more important issue with your semantics -
you can't possibly talk about, or fight against something that isn't real, there is no objectivity to the things you're saying - that's purely theoretical from the stand point of a discussion, this discussion. I've no doubt that science can slice up every phenotype to build exactly the image you are trying to paint - that of separate "sub groups"...
To the average "jew" he or she isn't gonna know the difference between a german and a norwegian especially if the differences arent too far off, which they are not. They just think "black person" just like most common white folk see an etheopian and think "black dude"
What gets me about your particular drivel, is how you keep mentioning "jews" like it's not obvious you're omitting a bunch of shit wrong with this fucking "argument" you think you have so smartly on deck
so then, what, is a jew? and by your standards, why does anything you have to say fucking matter from a point of personal sovereignty? Everything you've mentioned is a spook the same way liberals consider gender a "spook" funny how they can choose to be who they want, but it only works in their favor if they can call out those who, are basically the same (unable to help the skin they were born into), in every regard in so far as this "theory" goes, and so then their existence is purely hypothetical, theoretical.... Again, kill your self.
