>>9186020Calling someone a schizo doesn't rely on anything factual. It's not even etymologically correct. It's like calling someone a retard to try to make them sound stupid. But there's no disorder called "retard", just like there's no disorder called "schizo". It's an ad hominem that ignores the other persons argument and tries to discredit them as a person as a means to attempt to discredit their argument, rather than pointing out actual flaws in their argument.
Do you even debate, faggot?
