>>9198919>Stalin saying something doesn’t make it trueOh I am laffin now. How painful was it for you to type that out?
>historical revision If you have to rely of historgraphy as your main argument you don’t have a leg to stand on.
>muh historians agree They don’t on this subject. There are some camps that peddle the line victory was inevitable without lend lease which go through some serious mental gymnastics to justify this position. The Soviets were given their logistics chains necessary for deep battle operations. Germany was dictating the temp of the front up until late 1944.
Many Russian historians, the ones who work in the archives, say that lend lease was invaluable for the war effort. Most western historians never go to the archives. Believe what you want but the evidence simply isn’t in your favor.
