/bant/ - International/Random

[4 / 3 / ?]

Feminism Leads to Corporate Hell

Anonymous ID:GE3VAkT1 Mon 16 Dec 2019 18:49:19 No.9248685 View View Reply Original Report

I posted this on pol, but I thought I should also post it on bant because it's slower here.
Pics unrelated. I can't think of anything that would fit this, so here are some liberated women.

tldr: Women's rights leads to third world women living under Taliban-like regimes, while mass migration exponentially increases either forever or until there is a collapsing crisis (demand outweighing supply). This will separate the world into first-world welfare queens and third world corporate slaves, and we will all live in a corporate puppet social democracy.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1576521725680[1].jpg, 125KiB, 700x1007

Anonymous ID:GE3VAkT1 Mon 16 Dec 2019 18:49:46 No.9248688 Report

Quoted By: >>9248691

>>9248685
This is a bit of a blogpost, but I want to talk about something that feminists don't want to acknowledge.

How come feminists don't notice that their “women's liberation” will backfire on them? The first damaging thing they're doing to third world women is outsourcing child production and reproductive labour. In order to have these feminist Scandinavian-style welfare states, another part of the world has to be a hyper-conservative society that will create the conditions necessary for high birthrates. The first world has abundance which can then be used to educate women just as the feminists wanted, but this reduces the birthrate of the host country, causing a demographic crisis. In order to maintain this ponzi scheme, the host state turns to immigration, and this is where foreign women are really fucked over. Someone has to birth these immigrants, and the women who do birth them have to produce enough babies to ensure that at least two countries avoid a demographic crisis; the home country and the host country. In order to have these high birthrates though, the pressures against fertility would have to be removed, meaning that access to education and birth control for women would have to be denied for this first-world feminist pyramid scam to work. This would also have to be combined with the intense fertility pressure of religious fundamentalism, meaning that the end result of these “immigrant factories” would be a Taliban-like regime that keeps women in this specialized position. On top of that, these immigrants will eventually become legal citizens who will educate their women, leading to this cycle repeating itself with more immigrants, until either the entire third world is exhausted, or there is some other crisis.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1576521751211[1].jpg, 154KiB, 1200x899

Anonymous ID:GE3VAkT1 Mon 16 Dec 2019 18:50:06 No.9248691 Report

Quoted By:

>>9248688
Another problem that they seem oblivious to, is the creation of two new groups that are subservient to the state: the first-world welfare class, and the third-world worker class. In order to gain the revenue necessary to provide women with the benefits of feminism (through social services or government subsidies) third-world workers will be brought in to place a downward pressure on wages through their excessive supply, while also working under the table to dodge minimum wage laws. If this trend continues, all employees will be looking at wages that are approaching zero, virtual slavery. To ensure that legal citizens don't revolt over below-subsistence wages, the government will provide them with social services and boosts to their income. This will not be done based on ideology or charity, it will be done for political stability. Applying a “bread and circus” model of pacification will be cheaper and less risky than violent crackdowns. In order to pay for all of this, mega-corporations will have to pay for it through their taxes; they don't want to, but it's still better than riots. Because they will be writing the checks to the government, they will have an overwhelming influence on government policies; this is true today, but the trend will get worse over time, money talks.

So it looks like the end result of women's rights in the west is the subjugation of third world women for their child production, and mass migration until the world runs out of people to move into the first-world or forever if their birth rate is high enough. This ends in wages approaching zero, and first-world citizens becoming a class of people who don't need to work because they are being paid by the “social democracies” who have had to submit to corporations in order to tax them for the sake of political stability. Who the fuck thought that this was a good idea? Why can't women just have kids instead of getting educated and having a career?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:CKC+fWFX Mon 16 Dec 2019 20:34:29 No.9249047 Report

Quoted By:

interesting and atleast partially true today
I'll try and remember to keep an eye out for this getting more true

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

Feminism Leads to Corporate Hell