>>9490752>Compared to the rest of the worldThere's no some sort of unified world culture, so compared to the rest of the world any national culture would look unique
>Still counts, on "Still hit it tho" rulesIf do you recognise the superficiality of this fact, how can you still perceive it as some sort of actual similarity? Like, do you think it also makes Brazil in some way akin to Byzantine simply because both used to be empires at some point?
>English is the most aggravating-to-learn language on the planetNo? It doesn't have genders, it doesn't have grammatical cases, word formation is pretty basic, and so are morthology, orthography and grammar in general. The only thing that is somewhat complex about English is tenses, even phonetics aren't that difficult
>Compare Britain to any Euro nation, and you can count the similarities on your fingersMost ccultural processes that took place in Europe found were reflected in Britain's culture as well, in one way or another, be that Northern Renaissance or Modernism. Although it is true that some times Britain was amongst the first ranks of cultural progress, like it was with Romanticism, it's still absurd to claim that British culture is fundamentally different from its mainland neighbours when you have so much in common even on the linguistic level
>Not many first-world nations haveGermany
Russia
USA
Austria
France
Israel
the list goes on
>The USA has been in at least the top 2 for a long time, both Britain and Japan are AAA-grade according to the World BankAnd how does that change the fact that their economies were saved from a total collapse after the end of WWII thanks to the USA?
>You're a damn Russian, how do you have internet in your irradiated mud hutIs this the infamous English banter?
