>>9544731>antithesismore like the basis. schopenhauer's life as idea, descartes skepticism, wittgenstein's logical solipsism, nietzsche's eternal recurrence, leibniz's universe of relations, conrad's heart of darkness, etc. etc. etc. are all derivative from plato's forms which was derived from the teachings of socrates
the reverse is kant's thing in itself, newton's absolutism, hegel's duality, lots of others which derive more from aristotle
a summary is
>plato's forms were that forms were intangible things that could not be known in their entirety and the world is just abstractions of the forms, that the universe was just representations of ideas>aristotle's universals were that the form of something was intrinsically attached to the substance, such that a form could not exist as a mere idea separate from a real thing 
