>>9582952The numbers were being released early on by various doctors from China, but the conclusions did not match these.
For instance, the 2.1% mortality rate is calculated by number of infected/number dead...But that doesn't add up. Shouldn't it be a ratio of number dead: number recovered? If you're trying to figure out the number of students who fail a test, shouldn't you compare the result of those who've already finished taking it?
The early numbers gave a mortality rate closer to 50%, but I'll admit an optimism bias in putting it closer to 20%. The numbers I used were mapped from the early infections of the disease (Before January 2020).
These early numbers are far more relevant for a couple reasons. Firstly, the Chinese based their samples off of those that are being treated in hospitals, but a number of hospitals have been turning people away...Plus there's been a shortage of test kits...Plus people who might have it know the horrorshow the government it putting people through, and self-quarantining at home. That 20% figure was the mortality rate before the disease hit potential-pandemic status.
Second, these numbers are too high for the Chinese to willingly admit. 2.1% mortality is already on the cusp of panic, so can you imagine a disease ten times as deadly? They've already reported the early, pre-January numbers, so in order to pad the panic, they're going to make sure that the later statistics right this wrong. That's why the mortality rate in December of 2019 was around 20%, and the January mortality rate was about half a percent. Numbers don't change that fast, and I don't think the chinks developed a cure all of a sudden. I think they know they fucked up and are doing their best to avoid a panic.
The jews in America are happy to ride this lie for a while. They don't want their goy causing a stampede.
