If I can put on my Richard Dawkins mask for a second I’ll say yes, historically there were a great many benefits of polyamory among our species. Genetic variation and a myriad of traits were spread and passed down through ancient human groups. Not only were the sperm of one man competing against each other, but also those of others who shared the same partner in short windows of time. In fact one of the leading theories on how the male sexual organ developed is that the head of the penis acts as a scoop, pulling away competitor’s sperm before they ejaculate themselves. The euphoria a man feels after orgasm also limits the likelihood of physical combat between two males over a mate, once the alpha is finished he’d be blissfully napping while the other males could make an attempt on the same female. The difference in male and female vocal tendencies during sex also lend credence to this idea, with female moans serving to draw in more potential fathers. That sort of competitive rigor placed ensured a greater variety and viability in human offspring. Fast forward to modern society and it’s the same liberal dogshit degenerates promoting polyamory, with sluts wanting more shameless dicking and cucks wanting a crumb of pussy. Fuck that shit, that doesn’t help. So for me it’s either respectful traditional relationships or fucking thunderdome caveman rape rules where these entitled women are getting constantly raped by horny men.
