[44 / 9 / ?]
Quoted By: >>9688776 >>9688777 >>9688778 >>9688779 >>9688786 >>9688787 >>9688797 >>9688801 >>9688810 >>9688814
ATHEISTS BTFO
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Jesus
>Virtually all scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed. Reconstructions of the historical Jesus are based on the Pauline epistles and the Gospels, while several non-Biblical sources also bear witness to the historical existence of Jesus.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_and_origin_of_the_resurrection_of_Jesus#Post-resurrection_appearances
>N. T. Wright argues that the account of the empty tomb and the visionary experiences point towards the historical reality of the resurrection.[53] He suggests that multiple lines of evidence from the New Testament and the early Christian beliefs it reflects shows that it would be highly unlikely that belief in the empty tomb would simply appear without a clear basis in the memory of early Christians. In tandem with the historically-certain visionary experiences of the early disciples and apostles, Jesus' resurrection as a historical reality becomes far more plausible. Contrary to various theologians and historians in recent decades, Wright treats the resurrection as a historical and accessible event, rather than as a 'supernatural' or 'metaphysical' event.
With the coronavirus looming, why haven't you repented yet? Are you really gonna trust (((Carl Sagan)))?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Jesus
>Virtually all scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed. Reconstructions of the historical Jesus are based on the Pauline epistles and the Gospels, while several non-Biblical sources also bear witness to the historical existence of Jesus.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_and_origin_of_the_resurrection_of_Jesus#Post-resurrection_appearances
>N. T. Wright argues that the account of the empty tomb and the visionary experiences point towards the historical reality of the resurrection.[53] He suggests that multiple lines of evidence from the New Testament and the early Christian beliefs it reflects shows that it would be highly unlikely that belief in the empty tomb would simply appear without a clear basis in the memory of early Christians. In tandem with the historically-certain visionary experiences of the early disciples and apostles, Jesus' resurrection as a historical reality becomes far more plausible. Contrary to various theologians and historians in recent decades, Wright treats the resurrection as a historical and accessible event, rather than as a 'supernatural' or 'metaphysical' event.
With the coronavirus looming, why haven't you repented yet? Are you really gonna trust (((Carl Sagan)))?
