>>9955262I'm not talking about a spiritual state. Just "nothing" is actually adequate enough to be considered liberating.
If we are created, then that means we will forever be under the constant mercy of the creator, even if any scripture pertaining to this creator attributes him to certain qualities, this still could be enitrely false as the creator could change his will at any time, or subject us to more things. As what we're experiencing now is ultimlately due to his own creation, even it's faults.
If we're talking about some kind of spirituality, then constant existence is horrifying enough to realise; knowing that we will come back or be subject to more experiences likewise this one is just a pain. "Waking" up to be part of some infinite nature, knowing you can't escape from it and that nothingness is a sort of mirage makes me believe we have made ourselves ignorant of that infinite nature just to escape it. How did we forget that nature if it's ever so perfect and blissful to have fallen into this experience? And so we have, then that means nirvana is false as it's possible to fall back into some samsara.
>>9955265The only way we can know that reincarnation is related to a "soul" or could be a biological pattern reoccuring is to achieve human cloning, and being able to clone one's state. if your cloned state isn't "you" - that you aren't experiencing some "dual conciousness" with your perfect-state clone - then that means we do have some sort of individuality beyond this death. If not, then the soul theory would be shattered.
