Taking
>>2338671 into account, it now matters if you're wearing a top. You can hug half-walls to hide your nakedness. Stray too far from the wall and people might notice you're half naked.
>>2338881>why no bottomless?I do personally prefer bottomless over topless, but it makes more sense from a gameplay perspective to have tops be temporary power-ups to provide temporary cover to hide your bottom.
>>2338893Aside from not being particularly interested in doing that, adding male characters would require additional resources that I don't care to spend.
>>2338895I do want to have characters with different traits, such as a short tomboy who runs quick and has lots of stamina or a big titty student council president who requires using both hands to cover her breasts rather than the venus pose. I definitely do want an exhibitionist character who plays the game with the rules inverted: she starts with max shame and loses if it bottoms out.
>what if you control the pervert?You're defining a completely different game there.
>>2338897I'm not necessarily looking to make it super "high stakes". Sneaking around naked at school is stakes enough.
>>2338898If you think that's outlandish, you haven't played any Circle 4H games. Your idea walks on the bullying/blackmail/rape line that I'm trying to avoid. And I'm dropping the game show aspect; it's now just some challenge sponsored by the school or something similar that no one believes anyone would seriously do.
>>2338906That's actually a creative idea that would give guys some difference, but again it's additional work that I'm not too interested in adding.
