>>2427019Dude, I honestly don’t care if you’re mad about some dumb argument about qualities of images you could’ve ignored us like you said, but no. You instead decided to chime in and try way too hard to be serious by using “tripfag, or “cunt.”
Plus, I’m not really sure what you’re trying to accomplish by prolonging this pointless argument. Maybe calling me a loser? I guess? I mean...the same could referred to every Anon.
