>>2238217A+B, Jill's still on her dare to eliminate female clothing, and now we'll get to see Aria roped into helping Jill. I like the way that's looking.
>>2238170Strictly speaking, voting against something is the same thing as voting for everyone else. Voting +A, +B, and +C has the same effect on the results as voting -D does, so negative votes can be a convenient shorthand, and on their own (even downvoting two or more options at once) they're perfectly fair. You're right in that paired with positive votes, that doubles the amount of influence the vote has.
The most accurate way to handle it would be ranked choice voting, but that's only fair if everyone votes that way and it'd be wrong to ask that of everyone passing by.
The second best answer to this is just removing the way negative votes double power. -D is already a vote for +A alongside +B and +C, so the simplest resolution to the vote +A, -D is to omit the +A because that's already part of -D. In short, I think the best answer when positive and negative votes are paired together is to only count the negative votes, since that ensures no one has more voting strength than they ought to.
