>>2164433No you retard. I have no context for that even happening. Are you retarded? Literally not a part of my criticism at all.
This thread only happened because some retard made a feet thread under the impression the 80-day old one tagged correctly with fewer than 50 images didn't exist. So he got called retarded. Then two other retarded foot fetishists got second-hand mad and started spamming feet in the second feet thread, at which point they started making 3 even 4 feet threads.
>>2163694 got deleted because they didnt circlejerk spam feet in that thread, but we now have three different feet threads via this very thread,
>>2162663, and the 80-day old one:
>>2138730 because foot fetish autists got mad accidental foot fetish spam was criticized. This is just facts so don't blame the messenger. We don't need 3 topicless feet threads on the board, and their only defense for it was anger until they got board and abandoned all of them.
