I set mine running all day while I was out at work, using the exact prompt kindly supplied by anon here
>>2718403, running at the highest number of sampling steps my gui could support (250) for 50 images. I find the results to be of slightly higher quality than running on "default" sampling steps (~50), but at 250 it takes 5 times as long and doesn't give you 5 times as many "presentable" images, so my conclusion is that it's better to run 250 images at 50 steps than it is to run 50 images at 250 steps, you'll get more hits out of that.
I found that about 50% of the images had critical derpface or 3 legs or thalidomide arms, so I present to you in no particular order the "good" ones (plus a select few honourable mention derps)
> 1/25, and coincidentally one of the best 