>>1639124Narrow? I don't know. It has almost 9,000 entries on Gelbooru using the definition I am using. (And most are doing it right to fit the tag's wiki entry) And the image I'm complaining about, to the surprise of no one, isn't tagged.
Which by the way... it isn't even the definition I made up.
Danbooru uses it.
Gelbooru uses it.
>>1627597 this dude.Wikipedia uses it.
Every fucking news website that has covered it uses it. (Way to fucking many of them)
Freeones uses it... and they are an actual fucking porn site, all day every day.
If you think that image counts as a thigh gap. Most of the internet disagrees. It seems that the few who don't, are all on this thread.
It CAN'T be a thigh gap. Not because I don't want it to be. Its a fine image... If the girls in those images have the ability to form thigh gaps, we have no way to know. We can't see it. I'm saying the threads would become heavily convoluted if you could just post any image that fits the description HYPOTHETICALLY.
What's your take on it? What is a thigh gap to you?
I ignored the images that don't qualify just fine. I just gave TWO of them a quick mention since other people were talking about it. I think you think I am someone else.
People complained that I tried to credit myself by posting a lot of fake examples (I only posted 2) and then they only discredited one. Which meant I was at least half right.
So now I won't ignore them. Just because I'm curious of what I'll find.
>>1595901>>1602909>>1627576>>1627578>>1627579>>1627580>>1627583>>1627584>>1627585>>1627586>>1627587>>1627588>>1627590>>1627593>>1627766>>1627783>>1639011Also notice how the offending images I am mentioning are all from the latter half of the thread and were posted much closer together.
Granted, one of them was posted by me because I was in the wrong thread. We don't exactly have to change anything. I'm just saying.
