>>2757828>>2757821Yeah, /e/ is a pretty slow board and /sdg/ is already one of the most active threads. Even so, this is a pretty small thread in the scheme of things with only a handful of regular anons. As far as the technical aspects, personally I'm not too into the training side, it's all I can manage to figure out how to use this stuff. I do like to experiment with what's out there so you could consider me a tester or explorer.
Perhaps /e/ just overlaps too much with /h/. At least /d/ and /trash/ have reason to specialize their niches, but for the most part what works for /h/ works for /e/.
For now I think /e/sdg works as a showcase for the best things the tech can currently do as well as advice for how to get those results. We're probably not gonna ever be known for being at the bleeding edge of the technology.
