>>2847750Pure Pure is not an oc and was not inspired by miku. she literally appears in the official deco video, just with longer hair. is vampire miku not miku? is salamander miku not miku? is (not) a devil miku (not) miku? Pure Pure was not invented by deco, she was invented by caststation or whoever made that video, but she is literally the exact same character that appears in the deco video, just called a different name and with shorter hair
>I would argue that this "Pure Pure" design is close to the tipping point of where maybe the creator/fans shouldn't call her Miku, and furthermore that most people would also question whether that is meant to be Miku or an OC inspired by Miku (only when presented with the design, and without prior knowledge of the artist).everone who sees this character knows she is miku right off the bat. the context you speak of is the reason why there is confusion. the only reason there is any confusion is because caststation called her a different name. what exactly did you mean with that tipping point argument? is it because her twintails are shorter than the miku in the deco video? if so, then pic related isnt miku either, shes an oc. is it because she has different colored eyes? that wouldnt make her an oc. look at all the different miku modules with different colored eyes in project diva, are they oc's too? is it because shes wearing a slutty clothing? once again with projecct diva, plenty miku modules with slutty clothes.
>If there was no reason in the world about what constituted as Miku...once again, when people make lewd fanart, theyre just making porn, but its the same character. they could give her a ponytail, or maybe drills, but its still the same character. just because someone claims something is an oc, doesnt mean its an oc, especially when it looks exactly like the original character with slightly shorter hair. please dont start talking about the dimensional merge.
