>>2931234I'm sorry, but I honestly skimmed over your original post when I saw the results with
>>2930206 >>2930218. I thought what they presented would be easy enough to go off, but apparently that turned out to not be the case.
I've been using masked content:original all along, it's been visible in all of the setting screenshots I've posted.
I've tried pretty much everything you've suggested, including trying all the different Eueler A methods. Just about everything I get is different bikini bottom texture variations that might have the outline of a thong underneath or something, but never anything resembling the original images posted. I even went ahead and mimicked the settings here
https://rentry.org/fluffscaler-inpaint#settings (as close as I could- I don't have their Karras sampling method) and I got pretty much the same exact outcomes, just texture variants with a partial thong outline or something.
My intention was never to necessarily try leaning inpainting with controlnet, this again was what I was presented with ITT. Whether or not I have inpainting activated in this seems to make no difference though.
DESU I'm not really sure what easier sampler/scheduler combos would look like.
Does any of this have to do with the prompts I'm using? Because for this image, it's pretty much always been "thong, g-string" and "bikini bottom" in negative.
