>>1314711If bondage doesn't belong in /e/, it should actually be relegated to /d/, not /h/. However, nothing in this thread seams to violate the "softcore" definition. It's not hardcore as there is no male/penis/penetration/cum/etc. nor does it seem to be sadistic or masochistic enough for /d/. I think it fits the rule that "ecchi is suggestive" perfectly. But for even softer-core bondage, how about some ribbon bondage? ^.^
