>>1342552>Any amount of /d/ outside of /d/ is way too much.Fair enough. I won't debate you on your definition of what constitutes /d/-size, that doesn't really matter right now, but surely you can see the silliness of calling a couple pics in a 50-60+ pic thread "an awful lot." It's needlessly hyperbolic and only serves to antagonize.
>If you post that you report something, people bitch like you do.'Cept that doesn't happen nearly as much as you imply.
>If you post you didn't, people still bitch.Here's the thing, if it went like this...
>This shit is /d/!>Whatever. Report it and move on.>Kay!... and you left it at that, no one would care. Instead, you do this...
>This shit is /d/!>Whatever. Report and move on.>No!>Then shut up about it.>Fuck you! This is is /d/!... which, again, only serves to antagonize. You don't like it, report it. If you refuse to report it when people ask you to, you have no place continuing to complain.
>It's the /e/ board so it does.Do you see any men/dicks/cum in this thread? No? Then it's not pertinent and you bringing it up yet again only serves to antagonize.
If you really cared about this board, you'd use the features available to you and stop threadshitting. I hesitate to flippantly label anyone a troll, but, shall we say, there's an awful lot of fucking /b/ in this thread.
