>>2874536Right place or not, this is just the sort of thing I like doing.
So first of all, I've just read an 1889 translation of the Perrault version, and I'll try to reference elements of it as you apparently seem to be.
So starting from the river scene (we might be able to do something with the 'cleverly hunting small animals' section too, but I can't come up with anything just now that doesn't feel overly contrived), needless to say it'll be the princess herself that takes pity on the allegedly noble girl, who is terribly embarrassed not just at being seen naked by the princess but also because she's humorously self-conscious about her figure, which will have to be described in considerable detail, and especially her large boobs. Then when the princess's spare outfit arrives it naturally doesn't quite fit, especially in the chest, and the now-disguised girl finds herself uncomfortably close to overflowing the bodice but can't possibly mention it. So when they reach the first field and the workers dutifully announce that it is hers, the girl suffers a spectacular wardrobe malfunction in front of them, fortuitously forestalling any attempt to confirm the claim. The princess then offers her a second outfit, one with a "more modern" and much shorter and more lightweight skirt. They discuss stockings going out of fashion, and the girls is self-conscious because of course she's never worn stockings in her life. When they reach the second field, then, she disembarks and the light skirt is immediately lifted by the wind, again averting difficulty with her ownership claim.
Finally, at the castle, let's say that the ogre now has to be tricked into transforming by telling him that the lion thing is too old-fashioned and the thing to use for scaring people these days is mice. It's skeptical until the girl is brought in and duly runs from the room in a panic when her outfit suddenly comes undone at the same time as the mouse appears.