>>2195601>>2195612yeah totally. I wouldn't want to be spending all that time rendering different resolutions/version of the same video anyway. and having quality/censorship tiers tied to it.
for time stuff, you mean offering something to patrons only before posting public? is this something frowned on? and frowned is obviously putting it nicely heh.
>>2195608i noticed this also, specifically with ademar.
based on what people are saying here, ademar should be a top earner mmd patreon atm.
tons of custom made sex motions released public, with accompanying sex videos. made a posted a few ero dance motions. even made a model from scratch.
but has lower support than I would expect. I'd love to hear opinions on this.
>>2195643the post from
>>2195593 is not me
thanks anons for feedback here I will think about it a bit. If I do anything it wont be until later on anyway.