>>1894157Actually, she's not a monster, either. She's a cartoon. Just colored pixels / ink on paper. Which violates no laws in the US.
As far as being a "monster" in the sense of being the subject of a "monster card", the term "monster" is only a generalization for simplicity's sake. Many of the depicted "monsters" are indeed meant to be "human" or at least "humanoid".
Nice try, Cam Newton.