>>1962454They've been taught by feminism that men are rapist sociopaths by nature, and that any male sexuality that doesn't exist for the express purpose of validating them is treating them as nothing more than a sex toy.
If you're forced to talk with them, or if you feel like confronting them, call them out on being sexist pieces of shit.
>not sexism, because sexism is based in historical contexts and institutionsAnd if it goes this direction, call them out on attempting to muddy the English language so as to prevent criticism, and point out the flaws in their shallow slogan of a definition. "Institutions"? Oh, you mean like the ones that use affirmative action? Or the divorce courts? Or all of the woman-only scholarships that give you a free ride while men have to pay? Or the ones that subscribe to the feminization of mental health? "Historical contexts", huh? How long after a sexist event occurs does said event become sexist?
True language decay is rare, but regressive attempts to alter the English dictionary are prime examples of it. They've taken concepts that are descriptive and specific and have attempted to make them vague and malleable to their purposes.
