>>2905848>No, you are the one being pushy about something no one asked aboutI just asked why some of you were still using 1.5 models, some answers were legit but the last one was not
>>2905744 to which other anons responded making points about what they think were bad about illust making little to no sense aside "new bad, old good"
Also another anon(s) jumped in to respond to those so If you think all post about illust are mine, they are not