>>2744758You must be rather retarded if you don't understand that it's proper to give a tailor fair compensation when you give him a piece of cloth, however you obtained it, and he makes a suit for you, as long as that tailor never cared about the cloth or the suit himself in the first place. The tailor is in no way responsible for your decision to hand out the cloth if he hadn't asked for it, even if it's an expensive cloth you bought from a traveling merchant at a gigantic markup and you consider yourself a goddamn king. You compensate the tailor for his efforts to make a suit—which efforts he does have ownership of—not for the cloth that you bought and gave to him, and it's not the tailor that should compensate you for an opportunity to work on the cloth and a suit he never cared about.
Naturally, if you had done that tailor a favor in the past, then it would only be right of him to respond in kind. While I am grateful for your sharing motions with everyone and was intending to actually go ahead and rig it if my guess about your identity proved correct after
>>2744632 and you also provided or at least named a model to rig the dress for, like I hinted, this moronic exchange has made me reconsider.
