>>1905800At least half of the pictures you labeled as "No E" are blatantly showing embarrassment, and plenty of your "No N" are very clearly in the process of becoming naked.
>>1905979It's a good thing that you're contributing so much to improve the quality then. Also, congratulations on coming here since before /e/ had an archive, since your hypothetical land of almost all naked women doesn't seem to seem to apply at all to any archived enf thread. I'm not sure what would compel you to continue coming to a thread that hasn't appealed to you for almost 2 1/2 years, but whatever your Stockholm Syndrome compels you to do, I guess.
