>>2101380No. Why would you remove perfection? Here is this beautiful young girl, mixed with a dog or a cat, maybe a deer, who knows, and she's in broad daylight, wearing only a shawl.
Oh yes, it covers nothing, hanging loosely above her hips and exposing her lower half, but she draws comfort from it, security. A false safety net if you will. This is (fact) erotic, due to the nature. Almost relinquishing more modesty than brazenly stamping out naked due to her comfort.
You, on the other hand, wish to rob this, masterpiece of it's best feature. It'd be as if asking Picasso to paint in a realistic fashion; frankly, retarded and somewhat insulting. She'd be like any other picture of a nude girl standing in a vague, unfamiliar street. Woo! Yeah, let's copy the concept and boring nature so many lackluster artists have given. Why don't we remove here tail and ears while we're at it? We're already butchering the piece!
What I'm trying to state is your idea and taste is repulsive, and I want you to read this, really read it, and rethink your choice in eroticism of Japanese animation. Look deeper into the piece rather than following that primal urge in your lizard brain of "muh dik!"
Attached is an picture, unrelated, but this is /e/ and I needed something. Her angry, furrowed brow could be described as an appropriate reaction to your request though.
