>>1607681The thread moves slow enough as is (well, not so much slow, but in graduated periods. What's the evolutionary term, punctuated equilibrium?), so I'm going to keep the rules where there are for now.
I still want to come up with something clever for 0 next thread though, so keep the suggestions coming.
>Implying there will be a next thread.All that being said,
>>1607693 got me.
