>>2107658 #>poor anatomy>objectivelyOh god the irony... The use of the word "poor" to describe his preferred anatomical characteristics is to imply that in your personal opinion they're undesirable. There is nothing objective about your personal opinion. Using words you don't understand only serves to undermine the credibility of whatever point you're trying to make.
>You have no right to talk down to anyone. If there's anyone who shouldn't be taking here, it's you. The fact that you don't understand your own vocabulary aside, you've been nothing but a cunt since you arrived in this thread.
If you're really so passionate about realistic anatomy,
>>>/s/ is over here.
