>>2251804Of course in reality my way of judging isn't foolproof. Who cares what percentage of her body weight is honkers is if she's ugly and/or fat, which brings subjectivity into the argument as what is considered beautiful or what constitutes too much fat varies from person to person. It also goes without saying that for some grotesque, inhuman features can be and often are a deal breaker, but this too is up to each individual.
There's also anatomical concerns. Take the two extremes: Celestial beings the size of galaxies, and microscopic civilizations. Does it really matter if a Who down in Whoville has a perfect body comprised of 45% bap sirloin if she lives on a planet the size of a dust spec? Not to mention the cleft-face. There are so many factors.
