>>1307782Could be good but could be bad. the difference between "random" and "specific" is that a specific is easily skipped if wrong taste, of it's followed dearly if it's the right taste..
meaning, random is needed to be looked through entirely while a specific can be skipped. i'd say one or two randoms and the rest specific on the first few pages is good as a change.
on the other hand, having the same contributor on a random thread usually makes it not-so-random.. good job on the random part this time however!
p.s. captacha sucks, especially if you're not totally sober. it's impossbile. five tries so far!
