>>1414881Problem with your point there is, that image depicts a completely aberrant alteration of the body, any natural occurrance of which would be indicative of some kind of condition which is likely very unhealthy, and any occurrance otherwise an indication of steroid abuse...which is also unhealthy.
Or, if you don't like that point: It's overly fetishistic.
But, beyond that: What's 'classy' or 'artistic' is hard to quantify, and is largely a matter of taste. I've seen extremely classy, artistic depictions of full-blown group sex between entirely different (if humanoid) species. More often, sadly, I've seen shitty, tasteless, completely inept depictions of a simple nude body.
Anyway.
Post in these threads that which adheres to the board rules as well as your your own tastes of what is artistic and/or classy. That is all.
