>>1511161He's saying that such a slow moving thread isn't really something to brag about. Taking over four months to reach the cap means that people aren't contributing to it very much.
>Or is it just that you have nothing better to doBecause the ten seconds that it would have taken him to make that post is a huge timesink.
Statements like that are valid when somebody is spamming a thread for an hour, but in this case, it's just stupid.
