>>1691287Not every one has as specialized fetishes as you appear to have. I know it may be hard to accept, but different people will like different things. Some people like asses of all shapes, sizes and forms. This thread is for them. That it is not for you may be unfortunate, but doesn't mean that the thread itself is at fault, or that you need to go out of your way to try and destroy the thread just because it doesn't conform to your preconceived notions of categorization.
>there ARE threads already like this one. prove me wrongThe only thread that's "like" this one is a request thread and that obviously doesn't count. Also, it's logically impossible to prove a negative, therefore asking me to do so shows your limited grasp of logic. On the other hand, it should be trivial for you to link to a thread you claim exists, so go ahead and do so if you want to prove your point.
>will please no oneIt pleases me, and presumably OP and the other people who posted in it as well. Therefore your point is clearly disproven by counterexample. In fact, a thread with variety will please a much larger number of people than those with extremely narrow subjects. It's common sense. The fact that every person may not like every single pic that's posted in a thread doesn't make the thread as a whole useless. If you want that specific of a collection of images, try going to a booru and do a search with 10+ tags instead. Now THAT would be pointless as a thread.
>tit threads" that have flat-chested girls AND girls with huge tits in them [...] would be fucking stupid and pointlessIf you want me to make one to prove you wrong (again), you have almost succeeded. Keep at it.
