I'm surprised this thread is still going.
>>1755607I honesty never thought of this.
Would running on a treadmill lead to breasts hanging further overtime?
>>1755611That sounds like an exaggeration. Take away "everyone" and put "people who really like breasts".
>>1755658I like your argument, but consider the possibility that attractive people don't lack enough self-esteem to rid themselves of their attractiveness. Heck, people have died throughout humanity's existence over their own pride, self-respect, honor, and beliefs.
"Remove that *insert unacceptable socially/culturally item here* this instant!"
"...No."
"Burn the witch/heathen/terrorist/nazi!"
Based on your argument, atleast it sounds like, what they went through must not have been much of a big deal.
>>1755769Shallow would be not looking past one's appearance.
Being attracted to a specific part of the human body is not shallow. Focusing primarily on that and disregarding everything else is shallow.
>>1755821^This. Is funny.
>>1755997>I don't wish to justify those who may have objectified you, rather, to point out there are deeper issues involved than procreative genetics alone.Care to elaborate?
>>1756002...Did anon just give dating advice? Nice.
>>1756029>>1756031Gotta admit, that really sucks. How do you cope?
>>1756127Did anon just teach? Noice.
>>1756172>Wouldn't he also be less likely to diminish the self worth of the women with whom he consorts if he were expected to only be sexually active with women whom he loved?Would you like top rephrase that? It sounds a bit off.
I'm thinking "weren't" instead of "were".
>>1756679>>1756680I know this a 'Boobie' thread, but I gotta say that males tend to be constantly judged for their 'manliness' or lack thereof. Depending on the culture, of course.
>>1757377>And dirty thoughts are bad.Challenge: If dirty thoughts are bad, why is dirty rice so good?
Don't bother responding. I'm sorta joking here.
