Is this
>>1797314>rageIs this in response to
>>1796114 >go danbooru some shit ?Because this thread would be a one-post request thread at the bottom of page ten by now had anon not encouraged the OP to danbooru.
So, if given the choice, would you:
A: Maintain /e/'s elitism, but at the expense of shunning newcomers, discouraging participation, slowing the board to even slower than it already is, and posting absolutely nothing save for new or obscenely rare images;
Or B: Newcomers are welcomed into the community, given resources and encouraged to participate, and board circulation and civil discourse takes place; but at the expense of spamming the board with old shit.
Then I'm with
>>1796114,
>>1797399, and
>>1797586.
Not everyone here has been around for the same amount of time. And some of those who have have had lost computers and collections over time.
Exposing even just a single newcomer to a database filled with "the same old shit" that's been circulating for decades is, in my opinion, the most profoundly beneficial thing anyone can do for /e/.
Circulation is as vital to an image board as it is for the blood in your veins.
