>>1866023So 4-chan is not what I have considered it to be; A platform which imposes no mandatory POV.
In this case, 4-chan forbade the "loli", "shota" pornography, because of something negative the rule-makers see in that form of art(yes, art).
Everyone has their own set of eyes, the metaphorical one being the focus point when it comes to judging another. From personal experience bith deriving from my own self, and the colaboration with other artists, I know how "everything" works. Someone might disslike loli pornography, toddlerconing(that is disgusting to me aswell), but the fact that the one observing strictly doesn't see farther than their own focus point(which is something negative causing the creation of the global rule 3) means just and only that. In art, everything doesn't exist outside of your own mind. E.g. one artist that had dealt a lot with so the called loli art, in a perverse manner, looks at the characters that he draws as personas who are happy for having what is being done to them being done to them. I myself drew torture art for some time, I was intrigued by the thought for I k ow that I will never ever torture someone for real, and thus I created a character in my mind, that loves being tortured.
Your mind is everything you know, quite literally, limit it in no ways.
P.S. should I remove those two posts(and if so, how do I delete what I've posted xd), because I do not wish to get banned(and I assune the only way 4chan bans is with IP banning).
