>>2168758You know, you made a lot of claims in this post, and I just want to say that I don't respect it. My literal only "complaint" was saying the /e/ rules under
https://www.4chan.org/rules are straight contradicted by /e/'s sticky. You cannot disagree with this, since if nothing else the rules state hardcore is not allowed, yet the sticky says masturbation without toys is allowed. Penetration is legally hardcore, yet /e/'s sticky flat allows all solo masturbation with hands. Calling my pointing this discrepancy out a "complaint" is just using emotionally-charged wording to sort what I said as wrong without saying so outright.
My thing is just that the sticky says "/e/cchi is for:" then it lists some things. Then it says "/e/cchi is NOT for:" then it lists more things. There is this dumb grey area (of which there are a lot of thanks to the sticky) where penetration via toy that isn't masturbation is not addressed. I find it misguided that a girl with her fist in her pussy is allowed on /e/, yet a girl holding anal beads she's wearing where all you see penetrating her is string is considered "masturbation via toy" and is banned, but literally-speaking there is no case to ban any of these softcore anal images unless you start reaching. Which is to say create arguments from info that isn't there.
The original of pic related is too large to post here, but I will stop searching for softcore pics to post right now, and head off to bed. The thread will likely just be silently deleted during my sleep and I won't even be warned for it, so the 6+ y.o sticky of arbitrary rules will never explicitly broach the subject matter of my criticism, and realistically no one questions this aspect of it again. The sticky is a failure, but this isn't a crusade; I just like the images this thread was made for.
